Thursday, November 11, 2004

Heros

Generations of Heroes
Marshall Manson (back to web version) Send
November 10, 2004
In every generation, America has been graced with heroes who have gone to war to protect our freedom and defend our ideals. These heroes have worn all colors of uniforms ¯ Army green, Marine Corps khaki, Air Force and Navy blue. But no matter the color of their uniform or the manner of their service, they’ve always been there, under the Stars and Stripes, fighting America’s battles.
On Veterans Day, we celebrate our generations of military heroes.
In a perfect world, Veterans Day would be one of our most important holidays, and we would use it to build and expand a profound understanding of what our heroes have done for us and our nation while expressing our infinite gratitude for their sacrifice.
Make no mistake. They all sacrificed. Whether it was extended separation from loved ones and home or surviving combat or surrendering their very lives, they all gave of themselves for the rest of us.
Renowned war correspondent Joe Galloway - who has spent more time in combat than most generals - captures our heroes’ sacrifice in his description of the troops who survived a two-day battle in the Ia Drang Valley of Vietnam in 1965:
Our young-old faces, chiseled and gaunt from the fever and the heat and the sleepless nights, now stare back at us, lost and damned strangers, frozen in yellowing snapshots packed away in cardboard boxes with medals and ribbons.
Yet sadly, in some ways, Veterans Day has become a second-rate holiday. Most of us don’t have the occasion thrust under our noses by virtue of a day off. And, even if we did, taking the time to remember and honor our veterans isn’t the way most of us would choose to spend our leisure time. That’s unfortunate, and we need to do better.
How can we honor our generations of heroes? First, we can listen, and we can learn. Seek out a veteran. Take time. Sit still. Open your ears, your heart and your mind. Say, “thank you.”
If you can’t find a veteran, open a book. Though you can’t succeed, do your best to understand. Let their experiences seep into you. Even a small step toward understanding will make it impossible to discount their sacrifice or forget what they have done.
Make sure our children understand why our veterans are also our heroes. And help the children learn to value the nation and the ideals that so many have given their lives to protect.
Historian Stephen Ambrose captured all of this in his account of World War II combat in Western Europe:
At the core, the American citizen soldiers knew the difference between right and wrong, and they didn’t want to live in a world in which wrong prevailed. So they fought, and won, and we all of us, living and yet to be born, must be forever profoundly grateful.
Now more than ever, at a time when our nation is locked in a new battle between right and wrong, between freedom and terror, it is incumbent on those of us who have not marched into battle to do our part - to celebrate our heroes, and the generations of heroes that have come before.
Veterans Day provides the perfect opportunity.
Marshal Manson is the Vice President of Public Affairs at the Center for Individual Freedom. Contact him at mmanson@cfif.org.

In Flanders Fields

In Flanders Fields
By JOHN MCCRAENovember 11, 2004; Page D9


In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead.
Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved, and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.

Wednesday, November 10, 2004

Veterans Day

Tomorrow is Veterans Day. We encourage our readers to set aside time to reflect on the sacrifice of our Patriot veterans and honor them accordingly.
On November 11th, 1921, an unknown American soldier from World War I was buried in Arlington National Cemetery, in recognition of WWI veterans and in conjunction with the timing of cessation of hostilities at 11 a.m., November 11, 1918 (the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month). President Warren Harding requested that: "All...citizens...indulge in a period of silent thanks to God for these... valorous lives and of supplication for His Divine mercy...on our beloved country." Inscribed on the Tomb are the words: "Here lies in honored glory an American soldier know but to God." The day became known as "Armistice Day." In 1954, Congress, wanting to recognize the sacrifice of veterans since WWI, proposed to change Armistice Day to Veterans Day in their honor. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, former Supreme Commander in WWII, signed the legislation.
To honor those veterans who sacrificed all, an Army honor guard from the 3d U.S. Infantry (The Old Guard) keeps day and night vigil at Arlington. At 11 a.m. tomorrow, a combined color guard representing all military service branches executes "Present Arms" at the tomb for the laying of a wreath by the president. This is followed by "Taps."
The Defense Department has totaled one measure of the price of liberty -- almost 1.2 million members of our fighting forces have died while in service to our country since the American Revolution; 1.4 million have been wounded. The numbers, of course, offer no reckoning of the inestimable value of these individual citizens' lives, and the sacrifices borne by their families. But we do know their sacrifices defended a precious gift handed down to us -- the liberties we cherish. Every day -- but today especially -- let us always hold our veterans and their families in our hearts.
On this commemoration of Veterans Day, we encourage parents and teachers to visit the official Veterans Affairs website for instruction and learning aids on the history and significance of Veterans Day. Link to -- http://www.appc1.va.gov/vetsday/

Saturday, October 23, 2004

Oh where, oh where can OBL be?

Here is what we know. There has been no creditable information as to his location for about 2 years. There were rumors that he was in the Tora Bora region at the time of the last major operation (Anaconda). Rumors also states that he was in the Kashmir area of Pakistan, one of the ‘stans of the former Soviet Union, or western China.

Personally, as there has been not a single sighting of this ‘person’ (term used loosely), and the fact that he stands at over 6 feet tall, who would stand out like a nun in a whore house if he ever was to show his face, the only conclusion that could be drawn is that this bucket of pus is no longer has a pulse. My guess is that he was holed up in the bunker and cave complex of the Tora Bora, and as a result of the operations he redecorated the walls of one with a reddish/brown goo when the JDAM popped in his lap.

If not, then perhaps he would like to come out and play some more?


Thursday, September 16, 2004

Human sacrifice

The only way for CBS to redeem their shredded credibility will be to offer up to the American people the human sacrifice of Rather, the head of CBS News division, and all of the book lickers that work for Rather and or any other person who had anything to do with the program of last wendsday.

Any thing less will be un-acceptable.

Wednesday, September 15, 2004

Fake, Fraud, Forgery

The 1972 memos from the TANG more and more are looking like they were faked. There are too many different people who have looked at the documents and found problems. CBS is in deep kimche. The melt down continues. There will be an accounting for this situation. I have a feeling that the trail will lead to places outside of CBS that could be extremely damaging. I don't think that this is going to go away any time soon.

To my fellow blogger's: unleash the hounds!

Thursday, August 26, 2004

Shut up and sing why dont you

"If you're listening to a rock star in order to get your information on who to vote for, you're a bigger moron than they are...Besides, when I read the list of people who are supporting Kerry, if I wasn't already a Bush supporter, I would have immediately switched."


Alice Cooper

Sunday, August 22, 2004

Doug Giles: The Cult of Kerry

Doug Giles: The Cult of Kerry

Making the case - The Washington Times: Commentary - August 21, 2004

Making the case - The Washington Times: Commentary - August 21, 2004

Today in Investor's Business Daily stock analysis and business news

Today in Investor's Business Daily stock analysis and business news

The Union Leader and New Hampshire Sunday News - 22-Aug-04 - Intimidation and speech:
Who is trying to silence whom?

The Union Leader and New Hampshire Sunday News - 22-Aug-04 - Intimidation and speech:
Who is trying to silence whom?

HoustonChronicle.com - How to show love in a time of war

HoustonChronicle.com - How to show love in a time of war

OpinionJournal - Featured Article

OpinionJournal - Featured Article

Tuesday, August 03, 2004

In memorial

This post is to announce the passing of Alice Raspperry this morning at the age of 81. Mother of 13 children. Home maker. Grandmother. Great grandmother. She was perdeceased by ex-husband John W. Raspperry; sons Robert Raspperry and Peter Raspperry. Services will be held Aug 7.

Friday, July 30, 2004

The federalst

30 July 2004
Federalist Patriot No. 04-30
Friday Digest
Be a Winter Patriot!
Support The Federalist -- http://FederalistPatriot.US/support.asp
*Subscriber Services: To change your e-mail address, select
editions and formats, view recent archives, send comments or
to unsubscribe,
Link to -- http://FederalistPatriot.US/services.asp
NEW E-MAIL SERVICE! *Founders Quote Daily
Start your day with words of wisdom from a Founding Patriot.
Link to -- http://www.FederalistPatriot.US/FQD.asp
To defeat Kerry-Edwards in '04,
Link to -- http://Kerry-04.com/
Special Edition -- The Demo-lition Division
_____----********O********----______
THE FOUNDATION
"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington
_____----********O********----______
THE PATRIOT PERSPECTIVE
Top of the fold -- The impostures of pretended patriotism...
It's National Baked Bean Month, and the pretenders were in full regalia in Beantown Monday night as the Demo-lition Party launched its parade of their proudest, most pompous propagandists and praters in front of 4,300 delegates. Full of beans, one and all!
But the infotainment started the eve prior to the DNC's confab, when phony frontrunner John "Fastball" Kerry snuck into town to throw out the first pitch for Sunday's game between the Red Sox and Yankees. Against a backdrop of competing cheers and jeers, Kerry wound up and hurled one into the dirt well in front of his catcher, a 23-year-old Massachusetts native and Afghanistan/Iraq War veteran.
Apparently, Kerry's medal-tossing arm (or were those ribbons he tossed?) isn't what it used to be. Nonetheless, he proved he can still come up short when delivering to America's military personnel.
Earlier, when asked who his favorite Red Sox player was, Kerry responded, "Manny Ortez." The Sox do field Manny Ramirez and David Ortiz, but there is no "Manny Ortez" on the roster. (We hasten to add, however, that "Manny Ortez" was closer to the mark than the response Kerry gave the last time he was asked that question: "My favorite Red Sox player of all time is 'The Walking Man,' Eddie Yost." Yost never played for the Red Sox.)
Not to be outdone by her husband's sneak preview, Ms. Teresa (Tuh-RAY-zuh) Heinz (or "Kerry" depending on the audience) was across town telling her home-state (Pennsylvania) delegates that some of the rhetoric coming out of the Democrat Party is "un-Pennsylvanian -- and sometimes un-American." A few minutes later, Colin McNickle, editorial page editor of the conservative-leaning Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, questioned Ms. Heinz about what she meant by "un-American," to which she responded angrily, "I didn't say that. You're putting words in my mouth. I didn't say that."
When pressed by McNickle, whose paper is published near one of the many Heinz-Kerry estates (link to -- http://kerry-04.org/about/homes.php ) the opinionated ketchup heiress let loose with, "You said something I didn't say. Now shove it." (Not quite as eloquent as Dick Cheney's recent rejoinder, but close.)
Fortunately for the Demos, the Heinz-Kerry handlers whisked them out of town before they could provide any more embarrassments ahead of Monday's opening ceremonies. But unfortunately for the Demos, they failed to take convention speaker Christie Vilsack, wife of Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack, with them. Indeed, Ms. Vilsack provided plenty of amusement Monday morning in a Boston Herald Op-Ed, observing, "I am fascinated by the way some African-Americans speak to each other in an English I struggle to understand." She then added that Southerners seem to have "slurred speech," and "the only way I can speak like residents of Pennsylvania and New Jersey is to let my jaw drop an inch and talk with my mouth in an 'O' like a fish." Thank you, Ms. Vilsack!
Apparently the DNC circulated a memo to all convention speakers that they were not to speak ill of the Bush administration, but everyone else was fair game. Vilsack, for one, is confident that Pennsylvania, New Jersey and black folk everywhere are in the Demo- bag. But, John Edwards notwithstanding, we don't think Kerry should count the Deep South just yet.
There was plenty of entertaining print elsewhere, like this Washington Post front-page headline promoting its special section on the 2004 Democratic National Convention: "ELECTION 2000" -- we kid you not -- in a very LARGE font! But the Post headline was not quite as big as the font on the banner hanging prominently behind the convention speakers' podium under the al-Jazeera Arabic news network's press skybox. That would be the same al-Jazeera network, which regularly broadcasts (read: promotes) the torture and execution of American military and civilian personnel by al-Qa'ida terrorists in Iraq.
Al-Jazeera's 20-foot-tall, $30,000 banner was quickly replaced with another that promoted "JohnKerry.com." (Our convention moles suggested a "Kerry-04.com" banner, but the DNC declined, citing their extreme aversion to truth-telling.) Convention spokeswoman Peggy Wilhide insisted that al-Jazeera had not been singled out. "Frankly, we're not providing a forum for companies to advertise, we're trying to create the kind of atmosphere we want to best present John Kerry and the Democratic [sic!] party." Of course, the large Leftmedia banners for NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN remained in place.
It should be noted, however, that the Demos made amends with al-Jazeera by allowing Islamist imam Yahya Hendi to give a closing "prayer." Interestingly enough, this is the same Yahya Hendi who was a character witness for Sami al-Arian, the Florida "professor" who was indicted by the Justice Department after 9/11 on 50 counts of terror-related charges. (For more on Kerry's coddling of terrorists, link to -- http://kerry-04.org/terrorism/ )
Monday night was a blast from the past, featuring (not coincidentally) a lineup of Southern White House occupants and near-misses including Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and, of course, Albert Gore. And it was downhill from there.
Having endured four long nights of hot air, concluding with Kerry's stiff Algorian acceptance speech Thursday evening, we offer the following rogues' gallery of Demo-goguery, the retread politics of division masquerading as messages of unity and optimism.
On division (read: "Demo modus operandi" -- this from the Party whose theme is "Two Americas")... "We are constantly told America is deeply divided. [Republicans] need a divided America. But we don't." --Bill Clinton "Yet in our own time, there are those who seek to divide us. ... America needs a genuine uniter -- not a divider. We have seen how they rule -- they divide and try to conquer. They know the power of the people is weakened when our house is divided." --Teddy Kennedy "Reject Republican efforts to exploit our differences and divide our nation." --Roberta Achtenberg "There are choices -- the politics of 'Jim Crow' or of civil rights, the politics of imprisonment or of liberation, the politics of division or of one America." --Marcia Bristo "Together we can...transcend our differences and divisions." --Hillary Rodham-Clinton-Rodham "Sooner or later, voters in places like that [the South] are going to grow tired of voting on guns, god and gays and start voting on education, health care and jobs. ...We can't be a national party unless we are willing to take our base to Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama. ...We need to send a progressive message and stop being afraid of going to Utah or Idaho or Alabama or Texas." --Howard Dean (AAARRRGGGGHHHH!!!!) "Between now and November -- you can reject the tired, old, hateful, negative politics of the past." --John "Two Americas" Edwards "I want to address these next words directly to President George W. Bush: In the weeks ahead, let's be optimists, not just opponents. Let's build unity in the American family, not angry division. This is our time to reject the kind of politics calculated to divide race from race, group from group, region from region. Maybe some just see us divided into red states and blue states, but I see us as one America -- red, white, and blue." --John Kerry (Tell a lie often enough....)
On taxes (read: "class warfare" division)... "[T]his year, in this election, there is a candidate who understands the middle-class squeeze. Instead of just helping those at the top, I think we ought to give everyone a chance to reach the top." --Dick Gephardt (So, there's a middle class between the "two Americas" after all...) "Today, the middle-class squeeze has become a way of life for millions of American families." --Tom Daschle "[We're] standing up for middle class and working Americans who got a tax increase, not a tax cut." --Howard Dean "We are tired of seeing our hard-earned tax dollars go to haves and have-mores, while the must-haves, could-haves, should-haves, maybes and have-nots have not at all." --Stephanie Tubbs-Jones "And why had the powerful been allowed to doggedly cut taxes for the most privileged, knowing there was little left for the most vulnerable." --Rosa de Laura "[T]he truth is, we still live in two different Americas. We are going to keep and protect the tax cuts for 98 percent of Americans -- 98%. We're going to roll back...the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. We can build one America where we no longer have two healthcare systems. We shouldn't have two public-school systems in this country: one for the most affluent communities, and one for everybody else.... We shouldn't have two different economies in America: one for people who are set for life, their kids and grandkids will be just fine, and then one for most Americans who live paycheck to paycheck." --John Edwards "I will roll back the tax cuts for the wealthiest individuals who make over $200,000 a year, so we can invest in job creation, health care and education. ... [H]ere at home, wages are falling, health care costs are rising, and our great middle class is shrinking. People are working weekends; they're working two jobs, three jobs, and they're still not getting ahead. ... We value an America where the middle class is not being squeezed, but doing better." --John Kerry (The Bush economy is so bad, we're surprised anyone can find just ONE job.)
On race (read: "race-card" division) "In all due respect, Mr. President, read my lips: Our vote is not for sale." --Al Sharpton (Wonder how Tawana Brawley is voting...?) "In my hometown of Cleveland, the unemployment rate is over 11%. In our black and Hispanic communities, the unemployment rate is higher, entering into the double digits." --Stephanie Tubbs-Jones (And we thought 11% constituted "double digits.") "I have heard some discussions and debates about where, and in front of what audiences, we should talk about race, equality, and civil rights. Well, I have an answer to that question. Everywhere. This is not an African-American issue, not a Latino issue, not an Asian-American issue, this is an American issue. It's about who we are, what our values are, what kind of country we want to live in." --John Edwards
On healthcare (read: "Hillary-care" division) "We need to rededicate ourselves to the task of providing coverage for the 44 million Americans who are uninsured and the millions of others who face rising costs." --Hillary Rodham-Clinton-Rodham "John Kerry won't sit back and watch while premiums rise four times faster than workers' wages." --Tammy Baldwin (Oh, really? Kerry has protected malpractice lawyers like John Edwards for the last three decades, while Edwards and his ilk have padded their pockets with largess paid for by those very premiums!) "John believes that we can, and we will, give every family and every child access to affordable health care." --Teresa Heinz "You know what's happening. Your premiums, your co-payments, your deductibles have all gone through the roof. ... When I'm President, America will stop being the only advanced nation in the world which fails to understand that health care is not a privilege for the wealthy, the connected, and the elected." --John Kerry (John Edwards knows why premiums are so high, and isn't Kerry a U.S. senator?)
On "partners" (read: "gender neutrality" division) "[E]specially my beloved partner in life, Tipper." --Albert Arnold Gore "I found a true partner in life...." --Dick Gephardt "John Kerry will guarantee the right to family-health benefits to all our families -- including domestic partners." --Tammy Baldwin "In addition to being a Senior Vice President of the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, I am a lawyer, a mother, and a lesbian. I am proud to be all of those things and one thing more: a Democrat!" --Roberta Achtenberg
On Demo-leadership (read: "Dem and dumber") "To those of you who felt disappointed or angry with the outcome in 2000, I want you to remember all of those feelings. But then I want you to do with them what I have done: Focus them fully and completely on putting John Kerry and John Edwards in the White House." --Albert Gore (And we thought he'd endorsed Howard Dean...) "[T]onight, we're all here to represent the Democratic wing of the Democratic (sic) party." --Howard Dean "We went all the way to Herbert Hoover, and we never got the 40 acres [Lincoln promised]. We didn't get the mule. So we decided we'd ride this donkey as far as it would take us." --Al Sharpton "With John Kerry as president, global climate change and other threats to the health of our planet will begin to be reversed." --Teresa Heinz "Our struggle is with the politics of fear and favoritism in our own time, in our own country. Our struggle -- like so many others before -- is with those who put their own narrow interest ahead of the public interest. ... I intend to stay in this job until I get the hang of it." --Teddy Kennedy (Mary Jo Kopechne was not available for comment.) "I think I know a great leader when I see one and so does America. [Bill] showed Democrats how to win again. And so will John Kerry." --Hillary Rodham-Clinton-Rodham "For four years, we've heard a lot of talk about values. But values spoken without actions taken are just slogans. Values are not just words. And it is time for those who talk about family values to start valuing families." --John Kerry
On military service (read: "The JFK legacy project") "If you have any question about what he's made of, you need to spend three minutes with the men who served with him then.... They saw up close what he's made of." --John Edwards (Indeed, link to -- http://kerry-04.org/war/shipmates.php ) "Most importantly, they [Vietnam vets] know the real deal, they know the genuine article, they know the truth...." --Carol Moseley-Braun "I'd like a commander-in-chief who supports our soldiers and our veterans, instead of cutting their hardship pay when they're abroad, and their health benefits when they get home." --Howard Dean "On one occasion [as a kid], I rode my bike into Soviet East Berlin. And when I proudly told my dad, he promptly grounded me." --John Kerry (The Manchurian Candidate?) "I ask you to judge me by my record..." (Indeed, to read about Kerry's war record, link to -- http://kerry-04.org/war/ )
In summary -- so, what do we take away from all of this Demo-babble? We thought Bill Clinton was good at faking right and running left, but Kerry and company make Clinton's antics look like child's play. George Washington warned that future generations must "Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." Indeed.
Quote of the week...
"In fact, everything at this convention and on this year's campaign trail seems carefully designed to create the opposite impression from what Senator Kerry's voting record shows. Over the years Senator Kerry has voted again and again to cut spending on the military and on the intelligence services. In short, his votes have weakened this country militarily. Therefore the rhetoric of the convention and the Kerry campaign uses the word 'strong' or 'strength' at every opportunity. By repeating such words incessantly, the rhetoric counters the reality -- at least for those voters who cannot be bothered to find out the facts.... The strenuous efforts of the Democrat convention and of the Kerry campaign in general to create an image that is the opposite of the reality tell us that they know where he is weakest -- and that they think the voters are fools enough to elect an image without bothering to check out the reality." --Thomas Sowell
On cross-examination...
"At long last, say today's Democrats, we are 'united.' In fact, this unity is an illusion, reflecting the transformation of national political conventions to infomercials. If debate were permitted, a dozen or more planks would have produced a traditional platform donnybrook. Delegates swallowed their left-wing principles to accept a watery platform and avoid an internal struggle. They were guided by the party's sole unifying force: the defeat of George W. Bush." --Robert Novak
"Tonight Kerry speaks in the city where Ralph Waldo Emerson espoused a belief that much contemporary historiography, with its egalitarian bent, rejects -- that 'there is properly no history; only biography.' Historians may say history is made as much by the pepper trade or scullery maids as by presidents, but Kerry's biography matters greatly because presidents do. His biography suggests more banality than menace, although banality in high office can be its own kind of menace." --George Will
"Most of the speakers [at the Democrat Convention] engage in ceaseless doubletalk. They promise not to disparage the President, even as they do. They accuse the Republicans of 'dividing' America, even as they [attempt to] divide America. They say they will fight terrorism and also the insurgents in Iraq, even as they express ambivalence. Such equivocalness has got to drive viewers away. The Democrats' speakers also say things that are obviously untrue: that the Florida vote in 2000 was stolen from them, that George W. Bush has some arcane relationship with Enron, that the Republican Party is the Party of The Rich, though most of [the Democrats'] speakers seem to be millionaires." --R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.
"The Democrat National Convention...is trying to steal Ronald Reagan's optimism. Behind the party's smiling masks, though, is the traditional Democrat cynicism that says people can't do much for themselves without the help of government." --Cal Thomas
"This whole war record business is new to the Democrats. The notion of needing to have been in combat before you can be President has not been in the forefront of their thinking since about 1960. That year, an extremely wealthy Democrat Senator from Massachusetts with the initials JFK ran on his having been in the Navy during a war, having commanding a small boat, and having rescued one of his crewmembers." --Rich Galen
"Democrats are representative of the nation only if the nation we're talking about is Brazil. For Democrats, there is only the maid and millionaires. There are no Americans in the middle. To the extent Democrats are forced to recognize working-class white men, they call them 'fascists'." --Ann Coulter
"By my calculations, his 5,221-word speech contained exactly 71 words about his 20-year Senate career. That is the dog that didn't bark tonight." --Dan Casey
Open query...
"Here's the drill: State the obvious as if it is insightful. Then twist it to make it sound like the Republicans are fools or ogres for not seeing the wisdom in what you're saying. 'The Republicans in Washington believe that America should be run by the right people -- their people,' Bill Clinton declared to thunderous applause here Monday night. What in the world is he talking about? This is an election, right? The Republicans think Republicans should run things. Democrats think Democrats should. Is there something I'm missing? Are Republicans somehow 'cheating' because their campaign platform suggests that their own party is the right one to run America?" --Jonah Goldberg
"John Kerry once administered CPR to a hamster. This was one of the poignant vignettes we learned tonight from one of his daughters. Is there some gerbil-loving swing demographic out there we are trying to connect with?" --Barbara Comstock
The BIG lie...
(Insert most any quote from the DNC convention here...)
In other news from the Left...
Listening to the speech of Democrat vice-presidential nominee John Edwards, one might think America is reliving the Carter Malaise. Senator Edwards' "politics of hope" speech burst forth the happy news: America is in decline. The generic grandiloquence of Senator Edwards' homily of a divided America, "where one works and the other reaps the rewards," may not resonate with voters as well as the Kerry campaign hopes. The reason? Jingoistic rhetoric tends to collide with incisive reality. As Senator Kerry lambastes President Bush for his "tax cuts for the rich" and the "middle-class-squeeze," the economy continues to grow, having added about one million new jobs so far. Those pesky job gains, in fact, have averaged 211,000 per month this year alone. Consumer confidence is at its highest point in two years, corporate profits are looking good, and GDP is forecast to grow 4.75% by the fourth quarter of 2004. And Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan sees sunny skies ahead for the economy. During his semi-annual report to the Congress, he pronounced the recovery "self sustaining," due in no small part to a stronger employment market. Fears of deflation and a shriveling economy have all but disappeared.
From the JFK DEMO-lition derby...
Fresh from their success at forcing John Kerry, the French-looking Democrat presidential candidate, to stop using their images in ads promoting his campaign, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth are back on the war path against their fellow Vietnam Vet. (Yes, fellow Patriots, you heard that right: John Kerry actually served in Vietnam.)
One of the founders of the veterans' group, Charley Plumly, U.S. Naval Academy Class of '55, is one of Kerry's outspoken opponents. As Kerry campaigned in heavily military Norfolk, Virginia, Plumly, bitter over Kerry's accusations of American military atrocities in Vietnam, told the Left-leaning Norfolk Virginian-Pilot, "We were there." Like the other Swift Boat Veterans for Truth members, Plumly resents Kerry allegations of American "war crimes," in which he claimed to have participated. Says Plumly, "We know what happened. And it wasn't like he says it was."
The group's 250 members fought from the same riverboats as Kerry, but have been a thorn in their fellow vet's side throughout the campaign.
Left-wing pro-Kerry media critics notwithstanding, these vets are still high profile on the national and the grassroots levels. Indeed, as the Democrat Convention touts Kerry's war record, the Swifties are highlighting those pesky truths that Kerry and Co. would rather not talk about.
To read what the Swift Boat Vets really have to say about Kerry and his brief but highly publicized tour of Vietnam, link to -- http://kerry-04.com/war/shipmates.php
And a bit of fun ... Kerry recently lectured President Bush for having politely declined to address the virulently anti-Bush NAACP. "When you're president," Kerry said, "you need to talk to all of the people, and that's exactly what I intend to do." So, taking Kerry up on his claim, Grover Norquist, of Americans for Tax Reform, has invited Kerry to speak before his Wednesday gathering of conservative and moderate-conservative organization leaders. That invitation was followed by invitations from the Family Research Council and others. Thus far, Kerry (as manner-born as he is) has failed to RSVP.
In other news from the Political Front...
"The commission has agreed among its members not to feed the partisan political environment by appearing in any partisan forums or contributing to partisan interpretations of our report," says Demo 9/11 Commission member and former Watergate prosecutor Richard Ben-Veniste. "It would be unfortunate if that process begins before the report has even been officially released."
Talk about bolting the barn door after the horse has skedaddled! Shouldn't the Commission have employed this "no partisanship" rule by selecting a less politicized membership in the first place? And shouldn't those same partisan commissioners have resisted their biological urge to conduct countless Leftmedia interviews while the investigative hearings were ongoing?
Additionally, Commission members have done nothing to quell speculation that one of their own might be the right pick for the new cabinet-level position of national-intelligence director that they're suggesting.
News from the Swamp...
In the Executive Branch, President Bush signed H.R. 218, the "National Concealed Carry for Cops" bill, into law on 22 July. His signature ended a 12-year battle by the Law Enforcement Alliance of America and Congressman Randy Cunningham of California to get the bill passed and signed. The new law permits off-duty and retired law-enforcement officers to carry concealed firearms in each of the 50 states. John Kerry actually left the campaign trail to attend his job as senator in order to vote against this bill back in March. What about the cops in the Teamsters and their undying support for the Democrats? We're betting they'll overlook this vote.
From the warfront with Jihadistan...
On Wednesday, in the Iraqi city of Baquba north of Baghdad, some 70 Iraqi civilians and police officers were killed and another 56 wounded as terrorists set off a car bomb near a line of new Iraqi police recruits. Taking a heavy civilian toll on the busy streets, the attack marks one of the deadliest since Iraq's liberation, and by far the most deadly terrorist act since the restoration of Iraqi sovereignty on 28 June, exactly one month ago.
While The Patriot doesn't generally report on the day-to-day ups and downs of the reconstruction, a few observations seem to be in order. In particular, one aspect of the attack not lost upon the Iraqis is the fact that no Coalition troops were in the vicinity at the time of the explosion. Rather, the attack was directed solely against the Iraqi people themselves -- and we trust that this will bolster Iraqi resolve to act against the enemies of their state. Plainly, the fighting on the ground in Iraq is one of ideologies. Whether it be the thinly-veiled fascism of Ba'athist remnants or the Islamist totalitarianism of Jihadi insurgents, the Iraqi people are in a fight against the enemies of democracy and liberalization -- against those who see their extremist ideologies as the path to political and territorial gain.
Tomorrow, 1,000 elected Iraqi delegates will meet in Baghdad to fill seats for a 100-member interim governing council. Terrorist attacks are expected to intensify leading up to the convention, all the more evidence that democracy in Iraq -- and the Middle East -- must succeed. As in Afghanistan, the U.S. must stand firm with our newest ally in the Middle East and actively allow the fragile but intuitive forces of democratization to take their course.
On the Homeland Security front...
Earlier this week, authorities in Texas arrested an Arab woman identifying herself as Farida Goolam Mohamed Ahmed, and are currently seeking to confirm her identity and nationality. Ahmed, detained for illegal entry and falsifying a passport (which was missing six pages), appears on an FBI watch list in association with an investigation of overseas terrorism. Ahmed later confessed to crossing the border illegally from Mexico -- at a time when the government is warning of al-Qa'ida's use of women and non-Arabs as terrorists, to avoid detection. Authorities also report that fraudulent South African passports, like Ahmed's, are falling into the hands of al-Qa'ida operatives. Ahmed was traveling to New York. Developing....
Regarding the redistribution of your income...
Friends of The Patriot at Citizens Against Government Waste have developed a color-coded warning level system called the "Pork Advisory System" for wasteful spending in Congress. The colors match those of the terror alert system: green, blue, yellow, orange and red. Currently, the Pork Advisory Level is "Low," or Green, but that's only due to the fact that Congress is in recess. Appropriately, when Congress is in session, the level automatically goes to "Guarded." When debating budget, the level moves to "Elevated," and when appropriations bills are up, the level is "High." The highest level, "Severe," is reserved for when Congress is "in conference." Fellow Patriots, as Congress continues to refuse any sort of restriction on spending, we must keep a watchful eye. Reps. Sam Johnson (R-Texas), Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), Tom Feeney (R-Fla.), and Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) are part of an all-too-short list of fiscal conservatives that we should be thankful for.
From the "Non Compos Mentis" Files...
"I feel so exasperated that they [Kerry and Edwards] can't figure out anything except to try to act butcher than...[George W. Bush] when it comes to our international crises. It looks like the Democrats are too frightened to be labeled 'girlie men' by the party of Schwarzenegger to do what has to be done to protect us in this country." --Feminist author Barbara Ehrenreich
(So, Barbara, you're alleging that the two Johns are acting like "manly girls" in order to not be slurred as "girlie men"? Just wondering....)
From the "Village Academic Curriculum" File...
From the Academic Freedom Files: Students for Academic Freedom is reporting that of 792 donations from faculty and staff of Ivy League schools to the respective presidential campaigns of Bush and Kerry, we are shocked -- SHOCKED -- to report that 92% were given to John Kerry. The particular breakdown of donations is as follows:
Brown: Kerry 24, Bush 3 (Kerry 89%) ... Columbia: Kerry 118, Bush 18 (Kerry 87%) ... Cornell: Kerry 76, Bush 6 (Kerry 93%) ... Dartmouth: Kerry 30, Bush 1 (Kerry 97%) ... Harvard: Kerry 280, Bush 17 (Kerry 94%) ... Penn: Kerry 38, Bush 2 (Kerry 95%) ... Princeton: Kerry 74, Bush 14 (Kerry 84%) ... Yale: Kerry 85, Bush 6 (Kerry 93%).
Hence, the purpose of The Federalist Patriot's Collegiate Patriot Project is abundantly clear. If any of our loyal readers happen to be benefactors of these wayward-left academic institutions, we strongly encourage you to begin diverting those funds to the Collegiate Patriot Sustaining Fund. Visit the CP at http://collegiatepatriot.us
In business/economic news...
Despite all of Kerry's rhetoric regarding just how bad we have it here in America, more evidence has continued to roll in that our economic productivity is steadily improving. First we were told by the Kerry campaign that our economy was in shambles. When it was clear that recovery was under way, he insisted that said recovery was "jobless," resulting only in more wealth for the already rich and employed. This of course is nonsense, so we are being told that our economic recovery is unsustainable, that it's merely a temporary anomaly that will soon pass.
But Alan Greenspan testified before Congress last week, stating solidly and optimistically that it was wise to raise interest rates, precisely because the current economic recovery is decidedly sustainable. Indeed, there has been growth in demand, but most important, American workers have grown more productive. Greater productivity means profitable businesses, which lead to higher employment and sustainable increases in demand. According to Greenspan, future interest-rate increases will likely be necessary to reflect the growing value and productivity of the economy. Bad news for Kerry. Good news for the rest of us.
What about that "middle-class squeeze?" Recent reports conclude upper-, middle- and lower-income households have all benefited from the President's tax cuts, to varying degrees, but the latter two not nearly as much as upper income families. Rising gasoline and food prices have put the squeeze on wages -- wages that have not risen to keep up with inflation. Labor Department data indicate that the average hourly wage for production workers increased 2.1% in the second quarter -- behind the 2.8% increase in the CPI -- an apparent net decrease of 0.7% in real wages. The difference is due mainly to what Mr. Greenspan calls the transitory nature of volatile food and energy prices. Leaving out food and energy, the Feds say core inflation will grow 1.9% in 2004. One fundamental economic principle ensures an upbeat future for long-term wages: productivity growth. Even as the economy contracted early in President Bush's administration, productivity growth drove up hourly wages an annual average of 0.7% from 2000-2003. With the economy expanding, inflation projected to remain low, and the job market tightening, higher productivity -- and subsequent pay gains -- will follow.
Clearly, the numbers are on the President's side.
Speaking of bad news for Kerry, Greenspan has reiterated his support for Bush's tax cuts, saying that they moderated the recent recession and helped us along to a quick recovery. Asked about the problematic budget deficit that resulted from the cuts, Greenspan said, "I am for lower taxes and lower spending and lower deficits." That's exactly right. Bush was right to lower taxes, but lower taxes are ultimately meaningless apart from lower spending.
And last...
As John Kerry ended his speech last night, here is what America -- and the world -- heard on CNN as DNC Convention Director Don Mischer orchestrated the final fainfare: "Go balloons, go balloons! Go balloons! I don't see anything happening. Go balloons! Go balloons! Go balloons! Standby confetti. Keep coming, balloons. More balloons. Bring it- balloons, balloons, balloons! We want balloons, tons of them. Bring them down. Let them all come. No confetti. No confetti yet. No confetti. All right, go balloons, go balloons. We need more balloons. All balloons! All balloons! Keep going! Come on, guys, lets move it. J*sus! We need more balloons. I want all balloons to go, g*dd*mmit. Go confetti. Go confetti. More confetti. I want more balloons. What's happening to the balloons? We need more balloons. We need all of them coming down. Go balloons- balloons? What's happening balloons? There's not enough coming down! All balloons, what the hell! There's nothing falling! What the f*** are you guys doing up there? We want more balloons coming down, more balloons. More balloons. More balloons."
Somehow, a fitting finale!
Lex et Libertas -- Semper Vigilo, Paratus, et Fidelis! Mark Alexander, Publisher, for the editors and staff. (Please pray on this day, and every day, for our Patriot Armed Forces standing in harm's way around the world in defense of our liberty, and for the families awaiting their safe return.) *Printer-friendly format
Link to -- http://FederalistPatriot.US/current2004a.asp
-- PUBLIUS --
Support Operation Shields of Strength! The Federalist Patriot is
receiving new requests from military chaplains in Iraq serving Army
and Marine units which have recently been deployed on rotation. If
you're able to support Operation SoS and can help provide Shields
of Strength to ground forces on the frontlines with Jihadistan,
please link to http://FederalistPatriot.US/news/sos.asp
SUBSCRIBE: FREE by E-mail! Get your own subscription to The
Federalist Patriot!
Link to -- http://FederalistPatriot.US/subscribe/
or if you don't have Web access, send a blank e-mail to:
fedlist-subscribe\@thefed.com
(Friday's Federalist Digest is available in print for
$245/year. For more information, send a message to
hardcopy\@FederalistPatriot.US)
TRIAL SUBSCRIPTIONS: Send The Federalist Patriot to your friends
and associates!
Link to -- http://FederalistPatriot.US/addmultiple.asp
(Privacy Notice: We do NOT release ANY information on our users
or subscribers under any circumstances, nor do we accept any
advertising.)
UNSUBSCRIBE: Click on the "Subscriber Services" link at the top of
this edition, or if you don't have Web access, send a blank e-mail
to fedlist-
unsubscribe\@thefed.com
REPRINT AND FORWARD POLICY:
Subscribers may reprint or forward The Federalist Patriot, in whole
or part. If reprinting to another publication, please include the
appropriate citation The Federalist Patriot (FederalistPatriot.US)
in accordance with "fair use" rules, and our Subscriber/User
Disclaimer. (For questions, contact our legal department at:
Legal\@FederalistPatriot.US.)
PATRIOT PETITIONS: Link to -- http://PatriotPetitions.US/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SUPPORT The Federalist's 2004 Patriot Sustaining Fund:
http://FederalistPatriot.US/support.asp
For more information on joining The Federalist Founder's Circle
of major donors, contact Founders\@FederalistPatriot.US
SUPPORT BY MAIL: Make your check payable to "The Federalist" and
please note your e-mail address on your check so our publisher
can thank you. Suggested support levels: Family Defender --
$20, Frontline Patriot -- $35, Company Command -- $50, Battalion
Command -- $75, Regiment Command -- $100, Division Command --
$150, Corps Command -- $250. (Family or Frontline donors are
critical to our success.)
Send your contribution to: Federalist 2004 Patriot Fund P.O.
Box 507 Chattanooga, TN 37401-0507 (Help drive traffic in the
"right" direction! Include a self-addressed stamped (SASE) #10
(10" business) envelope with your donation, and we will send you
our trademark slogans "Veritas vos Liberabit" (the truth will
set you free), "Annoy a Leftist," and other stickers.)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
COMMENTS: Our servers automatically delete "Reply" messages to this
e-mail. To read or submit comments for publication, link to --
http://FederalistPatriot.US/comments.asp
Please hold your comments to 75 words if you want them posted.
Questions or comments NOT for publication can be submitted to
Executive Editor, Mark Alexander, Senior Feature Editor Cassandra
Cornell, Senior Content Editor John Machen, Senior Research Editor
Pete Parker, Feature Editors Jonah Walton and Brett Anthony, Legal
Editor Michael Coleman, Technical Directors Jeffrey Thomas and
Joshua Murray, Advisory Committee liaison Faith Long, or
Subscriptions Manager Michele Hope at. Note the name of the person
you are writing on the subject line of in an e-mail to
Editors\@FederalistPatriot.US
(Regarding editing errors, we put at
least one error in every issue -- just to see if you are paying
attention!)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ABOUT THE FEDERALIST PATRIOT: Link to --
http://FederalistPatriot.US/main/about.asp
Subscribers agree to the terms of the Subscriber/User Disclaimer
at: http://FederalistPatriot.US/disclaimer.asp
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
E-mail President Bush, link to -- http://www.whitehouse.gov/webmail
Contact your Senator --
http://www.senate.gov/senators/senator_by_state.cfm
Contact your Representative --
http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.html
White House switchboard: (202) 456-1414
House and Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121
Links to Central Government Agencies -- http://www.firstgov.gov/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Visit the most comprehensive tribute to Ronald Reagan on the
Internet and read the definitive conservative platform for the
next century -- http://www.Reagan2020.com/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"FRUIT FROM THE TREE OF LIBERTY" The Federalist Patriot is an
advocate of individual rights and responsibilities as ordained by
God and established in the governmental context framed by our
nation's Founders in our Declaration of Independence and its
subordinate guidance, our Republic's Constitution, as explicated by
The Federalist Papers. Our mission is to provide Constitutional
Conservatives with a quick-reading e-journal digesting a wide
spectrum of reliable information from reputable research, advocacy
and media organizations -- a brief, timely, informative and
entertaining survey and analysis of the week's most significant
news, policy and opinion as anecdotal rebuttal to political, social
and media Leftists. The Federalist Patriot is protected speech
pursuant to the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of
the United States of America. Statement of Allegiance as
subscribed
by The Federalist's National Advisory Committee, Staff and
Associates: "I hereby declare, on oath, that I will support and
defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all
enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and
allegiance to the same, so help me God."
The Federalist Patriot is a publication of Publius Press, Inc.
Copyright (C) 1981-2004 Publius Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Federalist Patriot is a Town Hall Citizen Organization In
God we trust. ><>

Wednesday, July 28, 2004

Bush "stole" the election

Per Curiam
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., PETITIONERS v.ALBERT GORE, Jr., et al.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
[December 12, 2000]

I won't bore you with the detailes, but here is the meat:

The Supreme Court of Florida has said that the legislature intended the State’s electors to “participat[e] fully in the federal electoral process,” as provided in 3 U.S.C. § 5. ___ So. 2d, at ___ (slip op. at 27); see also Palm Beach Canvassing Bd. v. Harris, 2000 WL 1725434, *13 (Fla. 2000). That statute, in turn, requires that any controversy or contest that is designed to lead to a conclusive selection of electors be completed by December 12. That date is upon us, and there is no recount procedure in place under the State Supreme Court’s order that comports with minimal constitutional standards. Because it is evident that any recount seeking to meet the December 12 date will be unconstitutional for the reasons we have discussed, we reverse the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida ordering a recount to proceed.

Seven Justices of the Court agree that there are constitutional problems with the recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court that demand a remedy. See post, at 6 (Souter, J., dissenting); post, at 2, 15 (Breyer, J., dissenting). The only disagreement is as to the remedy. Because the Florida Supreme Court has said that the Florida Legislature intended to obtain the safe-harbor benefits of 3 U.S.C. § 5 Justice Breyer’s proposed remedy–remanding to the Florida Supreme Court for its ordering of a constitutionally proper contest until December 18-contemplates action in violation of the Florida election code, and hence could not be part of an “appropriate” order authorized by Fla. Stat. §102.168(8) (2000).
* * *
    None are more conscious of the vital limits on judicial authority than are the members of this Court, and none stand more in admiration of the Constitution’s design to leave the selection of the President to the people, through their legislatures, and to the political sphere. When contending parties invoke the process of the courts, however, it becomes our unsought responsibility to resolve the federal and constitutional issues the judicial system has been forced to confront.
    The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
    Pursuant to this Court’s Rule 45.2, the Clerk is directed to issue the mandate in this case forthwith.

Sunday, July 25, 2004

A breath of fresh air



You have got to love this!

Vote for Kerry?

 
Can you read this and tell any of these 18 men they are wrong about Kerry. Kerry shouldn't even be a Senator ~~ he should be court-marshalled. Swift Boat Quotes about John Kerry

 
.
"We resent very deeply the false war crimes charges he made coming back from Vietnam in 1971 and repeated in the book "Tour of Duty." We think those cast an aspersion on all those living and dead, from our unit and other units in Vietnam. We think that he knew he was lying when he made the charges, and we think that they're insupportable. We intend to bring the truth about that to the American people. We believe, based on our experience with him, that he is totally unfit to be the Commander-in-Chief." -- John O'Neill, spokesman, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth
.
"I do not believe John Kerry is fit to be Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces of the United States. This is not a political issue. It is a matter of his judgment, truthfulness, reliability, loyalty and trust -- all absolute tenets of command. His biography, 'Tour of Duty,' by Douglas Brinkley, is replete with gross exaggerations, distortions of fact, contradictions and slanderous lies. His contempt for the military and authority is evident by even a most casual review of this biography. He arrived in-country with a strong anti-Vietnam War bias and a self-serving determination to build a foundation for his political future. He was aggressive, but vain and prone to impulsive judgment, often with disregard for specific tactical assignments. He was a 'loose cannon.' In an abbreviated tour of four months and 12 days, and with his specious medals secure, Lt.(jg) Kerry bugged out and began his infamous betrayal of all United States forces in the Vietnam War. That included our soldiers, our marines, our sailors, our coast guardsmen, our airmen, and our POWs. His leadership within the so-called Vietnam Veterans Against the War and testimony before Congress in 1971 charging us with unspeakable atrocities remain an undocumented but nevertheless meticulous stain on the men and women who honorably stayed the course. Senator Kerry is not fit for command." -- Rear Admiral Roy Hoffman, USN (retired), chairman, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth
.
"During Lt.(jg) Kerry's tour, he was under my command for two or three specific operations, before his rapid exit. Trust, loyalty and judgment are the key, operative words. His turncoat performance in 1971 in his grubby shirt and his medal-tossing escapade, coupled with his slanderous lines in the recent book portraying us that served, including all POWs and MIAs, as murderous war criminals, I believe, will have a lasting effect on all military veterans and their families. Kerry would be described as devious, self-absorbing, manipulative, disdain for authority, disruptive, but the most common phrase that you'd hear is 'requires constant supervision.'" -- Captain Charles Plumly, USN (retired)
.
"Thirty-five years ago, many of us fell silent when we came back to the stain of sewage that Mr. Kerry had thrown on us, and all of our colleagues who served over there. I don't intend to be silent today or ever again. Our young men and women who are serving deserve no less." -- Andrew Horne
.
"In my specific, personal experience in both coastal and river patrols over a 12-month period, I never once saw or heard anything remotely resembling the atrocities described by Senator Kerry. If I had, it would have been my obligation to report them in writing to a higher authority, and I would certainly have done that. If Senator Kerry actually witnessed or participated in these atrocities or, as he described them, 'war crimes,' he was obligated to report them. That he did not until later when it suited his political purposes strikes me as opportunism of the worst kind. That he would malign my service and that of his fellow sailors with no regard for the truth makes him totally unqualified to serve as Commander-in-Chief." -- Jeffrey Wainscott
.
"I signed that letter because I, too felt a deep sense of betrayal that someone who took the same oath of loyalty as I did as an officer in the United States Navy would abandon his group here (points to group photo) to join this group here (points to VVAW protest photo), and come home and attempt to rally the American public against the effort that this group was so valiantly pursuing. It is a fact that in the entire Vietnam War we did not lose one major battle. We lost the war at home... and at home, John Kerry was the Field General." -- Robert Elder
.
"My daughters and my wife have read portions of the book 'Tour of Duty.' They wanted to know if I took part in the atrocities described. I do not believe the things that are described happened. Let me give you an example. In Brinkley's book, on pages 170 to 171, about something called the 'Bo De massacre' on November 24th of 1968... In Kerry's description of the engagement, first he claimed there were 17 servicemen that were wounded. Three of us were wounded. I was the first..." -- Joseph Ponder
.
"While in Cam Rahn Bay, he trained on several 24-hour indoctrination missions, and one special skimmer operation with my most senior and trusted Lieutenant. The briefing from some members of that crew the morning after revealed that they had not received any enemy fire, and yet Lt.(jg) Kerry informed me of a wound -- he showed me a scratch on his arm and a piece of shrapnel in his hand that appeared to be from one of our own M-79s. It was later reported to me that Lt.(jg) Kerry had fired an M-79, and it had exploded off the adjacent shoreline. I do not recall being advised of any medical treatment, and probably said something like 'Forget it.' He later received a Purple Heart for that scratch, and I have no information as to how or whom. Lt.(jg) Kerry was allowed to return to the good old USA after 4 months and a few days in-country, and then he proceeded to betray his former shipmates, calling them criminals who were committing atrocities. Today we are here to tell you that just the opposite is true. Our rules of engagement were quite strict, and the officers and men of Swift often did not even return fire when they were under fire if there was a possibility that innocent people -- fishermen, in a lot of cases -- might be hurt or injured. The rules and the good intentions of the men increased the possibility that we might take friendly casualties." -- Commander Grant Hibbard, USN (retired)
.
"Lt. Kerry returned home from the war to make some outrageous statements and allegations... of numerous criminal acts in violation of the law of war were cited by Kerry, disparaging those who had fought with honor in that conflict. Had war crimes been committed by US forces in Vietnam? Yes, but such acts were few and far between. Yet Lt. Kerry have numerous speeches and testimony before Congress inappropriately leading his audiences to believe that what was only an anomaly in the conduct of America's fighting men was an epidemic. Furthermore, he suggested that they were being encouraged to violated the law of war by those within the chain of command. Very specific orders, on file at the Vietnam archives at Texas Tech University, were issued by my father [Admiral Elmo Zumwalt] and others in his chain of command instructing subordinates to act responsibly in preserving the life and property of Vietnamese civilians." -- Lt. Col. James Zumwalt, USMC (retired)
.
"We look at Vietnam... after all these years it is still languishing in isolated poverty and helplessness and tyranny. This is John Kerry's legacy. I deeply resent John Kerry's using his Swift boat experience, and his betrayal of those who fought there as a stepping-stone to his political ambitions." -- Barnard Wolff
.
"In a whole year that I spent patrolling, I didn't see anything like a war crime, an atrocity, anything like that. Time and again I saw American fighting men put themselves in graver danger trying to avoid... collateral damage. When John Kerry returned to the country, he was sworn in front of Congress. And then he told my family -- my parents, my sister, my brother, my neighbors -- he told everyone I knew and everyone I'd ever know that I and my comrades had committed unspeakable atrocities." -- David Wallace
.
"I served with these guys. I went on missions with them, and these men served honorably. Up and down the chain of command there was no acquiescence to atrocities. It was not condoned, it did not happen, and it was not reported to me verbally or in writing by any of these men including Lt.(jg) Kerry. In 1971, '72, for almost 18 months, he stood before the television audiences and claimed that the 500,000 men and women in Vietnam, and in combat, were all villains -- there were no heroes. In 2004, one hero from the Vietnam War has appeared, running for President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief. It just galls one to think about it." -- Captain George Elliott, USN (retired)
.
"During the Vietnam War I was Task Force Commander at An Thoi, and my tour of duty was 13 months, from the end of Tet to the beginning of the Vietnamization of the Navy units. Now when I went there right after Tet, I was restricted in my movements. I couldn't go much of anyplace because the Vietcong controlled most of the area. When I left, I could go anywhere I wanted, just about. Commerce was booming, the buses were running, trucks were going, the waterways were filled with sampans with goods going to market, but yet in Kerry's biography he says that our operations were a complete failure. He also mentions a formal conference with me, to try to get more air cover and so on. That conference never happened..." -- Captain Adrian Lonsdale, USCG (retired)
.
"I was in An Thoi from June of '68 to June of '69, covering the whole period that John Kerry was there. I operated in every river, in every canal, and every off-shore patrol area in the 4th Corps area, from Cambodia all the way around to the Bo De River. I never saw, even heard of all of these so-called atrocities and things that we were supposed to have done. This is not true. We're not standing for it. We want to set the record straight." -- William Shumadine
.
"In 1971, when John Kerry spoke out to America, labeling all Vietnam veterans as thugs and murderers, I was shocked and almost brought to my knees, because even though I had served at the same time and same unit, I had never witnessed or participated in any of the events that the Senator had accused us of. I strongly believe that the statements made by the Senator were not only false and inaccurate, but extremely harmful to the United States' efforts in Southeast Asia and the rest of the world. Tragically, some veterans, scorned by the antiwar movement and their allies, retreated to a life of despair and suicide. Two of my crew mates were among them. For that there is no forgiveness. " -- Richard O'Meara
.
"My name is Steve Gardner. I served in 1966 and 1967 on my first tour of duty in Vietnam on Swift boats, and I did my second tour in '68 and '69, involved with John Kerry in the last 2 1/2 months of my tour. The John Kerry that I know is not the John Kerry that everybody else is portraying. I served alongside him and behind him, five feet away from him in a gun tub, and watched as he made indecisive moves with our boat, put our boats in jeopardy, put our crews in jeopardy... if a man like that can't handle that 6-man crew boat, how can you expect him to be our Commander-in-Chief?" -- Steven Gardner
.
"I served in Vietnam as a boat officer from June of 1968 to July of 1969. My service was three months in Coastal Division 13 out of Cat Lo, and nine months with Coastal Division 11 based in An Thoi. John Kerry was in An Thoi the same time I was. I'm here today to express the anger I have harbored for over 33 years, about being accused with my fellow shipmates of war atrocities. All I can say is when I leave here today, I'm going down to the Wall to tell my two crew members it's not true, and that they and the other 49 Swiftees who are on the Wall were then and are still now the best." -- Robert Brant
.
"I never saw, heard of, or participated in any Swift boat crews killing cattle, poisoning crops, or raping and killing civilians as charged by John Kerry, both in his book and in public statements. Since we both operated at the same time, in the same general area, and on the same missions under the same commanders, it is hard to believe his claims of atrocities and poor planning of Sea Lord missions. I signed this letter because I feel that he used Swift boat sailors to proclaim his antiwar statements after the war, and now he uses the same Swift boat sailors to support his claims of being a war hero. He cannot have it both ways, and we are here to ask for full disclosure of the proof of his claims." -- James Steffes
..Please, forward this to everybody on your lists. Voters in the United States of America need to see this article to get a genuine understanding of this scumbag. Thanks ... Last Updated Monday, May 17 2004 @ 12:16 PM PDT

Friday, July 23, 2004

Just shut up and sing

Linda Ronstat; booed off stage in Vegas for voicing political views while in concert. The audience reacts negatively (so I hear) to the message of Ms. Ronstat. Then Ms. Ronstat is escorted off the property according to news reports.

Note to Ms. Ronstat: SHUT UP AND SING. If the audience wanted to hear what you had to say, they would have gone to an event where you paid for it not the people who bought tickets to hear you sing. Don't use someone else's dime to foist your views. We don't want to hear it. If you and your buddy MOORELIES believe that you have been censured, get a grip and a clue. You were contracted to sing.

If you want to flap your gums, use your own venue.

 
Have a nice life.

Thursday, July 22, 2004

Classified Document Holder

Well, it seems that the former National Security Adviser has a bit of a problem. That aint the half of it. This lugnut failed to follow instructions having to do with handling of classified documents and now tried to joke his way out of some hard time in a prison cell. Whit I see is he aint the only one with a "personnel" problem. The people at the secure document section of the archive also have some 'splainin' to do. At the minimum, the document clerk should be demoted, the security manager should be fired and Berger's security clearance should be revoked and he should NEVER be allowed unaccompanied access to any document classifieds higher the "For Official Use Only"

Friday, June 25, 2004

Kerry has a problem

(From the Federalist web site)

Upon entering the Navy in 1966, John Kerry signed a six-year contract (plus a six-month extension during wartime) and an Officer Candidate contract for five years of active duty and active Naval Reserve. This indicates that Kerry was clearly a commissioned officer at the time of his 1970 meeting with NVA Communists in Paris -- in direct violation of the UCMJ's Article 104 part 904, and U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. 953. That meeting, and Kerry's subsequent coddling of Communists while leading mass protests against our military in the year that followed, also place him in direct violation of our Constitution's Article three, Section three, which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of warfare. (As General Vo Nguyen Giap is his witness....)

Thus, we refer our readers to the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, which states, "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President ... having previously taken an oath ... to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof."

It is for this reason -- for his record of giving aid and comfort to the enemy while a member of the U.S. Armed Forces in violation of his oath -- that we insist John Kerry resign his seat in the U.S. Senate. He has dishonored his family, dishonored his state and dishonored our nation. He is not fit for public office at any level of government, much less, the highest office in the land. John Kerry should resign.

Monday, June 14, 2004

Jeff Jacoby: Mutilations and Muslim law

Jeff Jacoby: Mutilations and Muslim law


This hits the nail right on the head. Make no mistake, we (the Western world) have no choice but to fight and win ths war that has been forced on us.

Thursday, May 27, 2004

Point to ponder

The Gettysburg Address


Abraham Lincoln
November 19, 1863
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember, what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we may take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Tuesday, May 25, 2004

Just a little something I wrote

I penned this back in 1996 when I was going to school after the Army.









ERIC P. RASPPERRY

ENGLISH 60

MR. GANZE

12 November 1996

AIDS/HI V Infections: Why the histrionics

In an attempt to understand the insanity that surrounds the AIDS/HIV issue, one must understand the politically correct power blocks that are driving the issue and the population subsets that are being infected by this virus. We must also agree on the definitions of a few words in order to preclude any confusion. The first word is “epidemic”. According to Webster’s New World Dictionary, epidemic means “spreading rapidly among many people in a community”. The second is the word “pandemic”. This word means “epidemic over a large region”.

Medical research has shown that this virus is very difficult to transmit from one person to another. In the overall US population of 270,000,000 people, the reported number of Infections by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention are 513,486 as of 31 December 1995. This number of reported infections can in no stretch of the imagination constitute an epidemic based on the percentage of infections to the total population. By doing the math, I came up with this figure for the percentage of infections: 0.19018% of the total population. This percentage is of no statistical significance. As you can see, this figure is absurdly small compared to the total population. Adult and adolescent cases number 506,538 with 434,719 cases in males, 71,818 cases in females and one case in a person who’s sex in unknown. As of the above stated date, 6,948 AIDS cases were reported in children. “Children” refers to persons under the age of 13 at the time of diagnosis. As of the end of 1995, the total number of deaths attributed to AIDS id 319,849 including 3,921 children.
To understand this fact, one should know the primary means of transmission for the virus. According to the CDC, the largest risk factor in the transmission of the virus is “men who have sex with men”. Homosexual activity accounts for a total of 259,627 reported cases, followed injected drug use with 95,244 male and 33,454 female for a total of 128,696 cases. Homosexual men who also are IV drug users account for another 33,195 cases. AIDS cases in the heterosexual population account for 13,521 male and 26,516 female for a total of 40,037 cases. Persons with Hemophilia or other coagulation disorders account for 3970 male and 137 female, for a total of 4107 cases. Persons who received contaminated blood products or tissue account for 4327 males and 3106 females totaling 7433. Persons whose risk was not reported include 24,790 males and 8,607 females for a total of 33,397 cases.

As you can see from the exposure breakdown, by and far the most hazardous behavior is Homosexuality, followed by IV drug use. The BIG QUESTION is what can be done about this “epidemic”? One answer being shoved down our collective throats is dropping massive amounts of government (read taxpayer) cash into research in the possible hope of a cure. The “Gay Rights” lobby supports this option. On the other end of the spectrum is the “Ultra-Right Wing” religious fanatic who would have any person that tests positive for HIV should be shipped off to a sanitarium for the greater good of the society like the TB sanitariums of the late 19th century. The truth lies somewhere in the middle.

To make assumptions on the spread of this infectious agent based on the demographic break out of infections, it is clear that the infections are based mainly on a person’s behavior. So, modify the behaviors that make the population most at risk, you control the rate of further infections. The “Gay” lobby says distribute condoms to everyone to include elementary school kids. However, this is not a viable option. Condoms are known for a high failure rate particularly when used during anal intercourse. In “normal” use, condoms suffer a failure rate as high as 20%. The failure rate during anal intercourse is as high as 70%. This brings to mind a bumper sticker I saw in a pickup truck in the school parking structure. It read, “A Tiskit, A Taskat, A Condom or a Casket”. In my mind, just the act of keeping your zipper up, and your “tallywacker” in your pants is much more effective in preventing the spread of AIDS or any other STD.

The Ultimate War Sim

The Ultimate War Sim


THis is something to see.

Friday, May 21, 2004

Armor mission statement

The mission of the Armor Branch:

Close with and destroy the enemy using fire maneuver and shock effect.

Army mission statment

Mission
The Army’s mission is to fight and win our Nation’s wars by providing prompt, sustained land dominance across the full range of military operations and spectrum of conflict in support of combatant commanders. We do this by:

• Executing Title 10 and Title 32 United States Code directives, to include organizing, equipping, and training forces for the conduct of prompt and sustained combat operations on land.

• Accomplishing missions assigned by the President, Secretary of Defense and combatant commanders, and Transforming for the future.

Saturday, May 15, 2004


A place where heros sleep. Posted by Hello

Why we fight. Posted by Hello

Just a thought

If the "fearless" warriors who carry out Jihad are so brave, then why do they cover their faces when they perform their acts of "holy war"?

What's up with that?

Friday, May 14, 2004

FRAGO

Charlie 11 this is Charlie 92, frago follows........

move to and occupy battle position 17. Scouts report enemy activity vicinity phase line truth. Be prepared to defend in place NLT 1800Z. Destroy all enemy forces within EA Fact. Current SOI in effect, Execute time now.